- Northeast News to close: latest casualty of shifting economyPosted 1 year ago
- Stop Safe coordinator: BC needs to increase fines for school bus stop sign infractionsPosted 1 year ago
- Site C job fairs announced for Peace RegionPosted 1 year ago
- New digital mobile mammography vehicles coming to the PeacePosted 1 year ago
- RCMP searching for WagmanPosted 1 year ago
- Identity of man found dead after Charlie Lake standoff confirmed by BC Coroners ServicePosted 1 year ago
- Dawson Creek Reiki practitioner finds a loyal clientele in the PeacePosted 1 year ago
- Alaska Highway reopened after collisionPosted 1 year ago
- Dawson Creek mayor wants to bring Kindness Meters to D.C.Posted 1 year ago
- Northern BC to get Nurse PractitionersPosted 1 year ago
The economy of Site C versus natural gas
Jan 9/16 letter to editor
The new year is beginning on a very rough economic note: the down turn in the oil and natural industry along with the economy in general has gone far south by any standard.
News of major slow downs in China and India have also lead the news stories in recent weeks. So, according to Premier Clark, even if we haven’t got a single LNG facility up and running here in BC , at least we have Site C up and running or…..so would Madame Clark have us believe.
The push for a Site C looks sugar coated and inviting . Madame Clark encourages us to look at the “positives”. She has convinced many British Columbians that we need more “home grown” or made in BC jobs. Site C, according to her will offer just that.
But, here are a few interesting facts: At the height of building a Site C mega dam project, approximately 1500 jobs will be needed. Sounds like a lot for a project costing BC taxpayers a cool $9 Billion dollars?
Yet, just months ago, the Shepard Energy facility in Calgary quietly became operational producing electricity (using natural gas) for the local residents of Calgary . At the height of its construction, the Shepard had 2,630 jobs for a variety of construction related activities. The total cost of the project to the rate payers of Alberta is $ 1.4 Billion dollars.
Ah….but Site C must be producing much more energy than a Shepard Energy natural gas powered facility, you must be thinking….?. Wrong: The Shepard Centre will be producing 6500 GWh of electricity/year compared with a Site C project of 5100 GWh/year of electricity. That’s 22% MORE energy from a natural gas powered Shepard Energy facility than a Site C would produce.
So, Calgarians will get 22% MORE energy from natural gas than a Site C project will produce at a savings of $7.6 Billion dollars. And…..the Shepard Centre also utilized an ADDITIONAL 1130 home grown jobs for their project in comparison with Site C.
So, here in BC we get 1130 fewer jobs, LESS energy from Site C and we get to pay $7.6 Billion dollars MORE?
You must be thinking that there is something wrong with the math. After all, our BC politicians would not be trying to pull the wool over our eyes?
Perhaps this is precisely the time to ask your MLA what this government is thinking when it comes to managing our energy and fiscal needs.
It is time for transparency and accountability from the BC Liberal government about the Site C project.
One Footnote: Shepard Energy customers will be guaranteed 8 cents per KWh until 2020. Meanwhile , BC Hydro customer rates continue to skyrocket each and every year well above the 8 cent threshold.
Charlie Lake , BC